KLINIK ENDODONTIYADA IRRIGATSION ERITMALAR: TURLARI, XUSUSIYATLARI VA FAOLLASHTIRISH MEXANIZMLARI



Chop etilgan sana:

PDF
Ergashev Bekzod Jaloliddin o‘g‘li
Central Asian Medical University xalqaro tibbiyot universiteti, Burhoniddin

Abstract

Ushbu adabiyotlar sharhida klinik endodontikada qo‘llaniladigan irrigatsiya eritmalarining turlari, xususiyatlari va faollashtirish mexanizmlari keng qamrovli tahlil qilingan. 58 ta dolzarb tadqiqot asosida sodium gipoxlorit keng spektrli antimikrobiyal va to‘qima eritish xususiyatlari tufayli asosiy irrigant sifatida e’tirof etilgan. EDTA smear qatlamini olib tashlashda samarali ekani ko‘rsatilgan. MTAD va QMix kabi zamonaviy irrigantlarning ko‘p funksiyali xususiyatlari ta’kidlangan bo‘lsa-da, ularning klinik natijalari hali to‘liq isbotlanmagan. Irrigantlarni faollashtirish irrigatsiya samaradorligini oshirishda hal qiluvchi ahamiyatga ega. Passiv ultrasonik irrigatsiya (PUI) irrigant penetratsiyasini oshirish va biofilmni yo‘qotishda eng samarali usul sifatida ajralib turadi. Sonik faollashtirish, salbiy bosim tizimlari va lazer yordamida irrigatsiya muqobil yoki yordamchi variantlar sifatida o‘rganilgan.

Tahlil natijasida NaOCl va EDTA ni ultrasonik faollashtirish bilan birlashtirish optimal dezinfeksiya va uzoq muddatli klinik muvaffaqiyat uchun eng yaxshi natija berishini tasdiqlaydi. Xavfsizlik jihatlari, xususan irrigant ekstruziya va to‘qimalarga toksik ta’siri, klinik protokol tanlashda hisobga olinishi lozim.

Foydalangan adabiyotlar

1. Basrani, B. (2012). Endodontic irrigation: chemical disinfection of the root canal system. Springer.
2. Haapasalo, M., Endal, U., Zandi, H., & Coil, J. M. (2005). Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endodontic Topics, 10(1), 77–102.
3. Zehnder, M. (2006). Root canal irrigants. Journal of Endodontics, 32(5), 389–398.
4. Siqueira, J. F., & Rôças, I. N. (2008). Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. Journal of Endodontics, 34(11), 1291–1301.
5. Mohammadi, Z., & Shalavi, S. (2014). Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. International Dental Journal, 64(6), 329–341.
6. Byström, A., & Sundqvist, G. (1985). The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. International Endodontic Journal, 18(1), 35–40.
7. Torabinejad, M., & Walton, R. E. (2009). Endodontics: Principles and practice (4th ed.). Saunders.
8. Giardino, L., Ambu, E., Savoldi, E., Rimondini, R., & Debbia, E. A. (2007). Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite, MTAD, and tetraclean against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Journal of Endodontics, 33(7), 852–855.
9. Baumgartner, J. C., Cuenin, P. R., & Langeland, K. (1987). Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal debridement. Journal of Endodontics, 13(2), 59–66.
10. Retamozo, B., Shabahang, S., Johnson, N., Aprecio, R., & Torabinejad, M. (2010). Minimum contact time and concentration of sodium hypochlorite required to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Endodontics, 36(3), 520–523.
11. Haapasalo, M., & Ørstavik, D. (1987). In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. Journal of Dental Research, 66(8), 1375–1379.
12. Hülsmann, M., & Hahn, W. (2000). Complications during root canal irrigation—literature review and case reports. International Endodontic Journal, 33(3), 186–193.
13. Mohammadi, Z. (2008). Chlorhexidine: Its properties and applications in endodontics. Iranian Endodontic Journal, 3(3), 113–122.
14. Kuruvilla, J. R., & Kamath, M. P. (1998). Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate against Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Endodontics, 24(7), 472–476.
15. Estrela, C., Estrela, C. R., Barbin, E. L., Spanó, J. C., Marchesan, M. A., & Pécora, J. D. (2002). Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Brazilian Dental Journal, 13(2), 113–117.
16. Tay, F. R., Gu, L. S., Schoeffel, G. J., Wimmer, C., Susin, L., Zhang, K., & Pashley, D. H. (2010). Effect of irrigation sequence on the removal of smear layer and debris with self-adjusting file. Journal of Endodontics, 36(4), 704–708.
17. Plotino, G., Pameijer, C. H., Grande, N. M., & Somma, F. (2007). Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. Journal of Endodontics, 33(2), 81–95.
18. van der Sluis, L. W., Versluis, M., Wu, M. K., & Wesselink, P. R. (2007). Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. International Endodontic Journal, 40(6), 415–426.
19. Norrington, J., & Cameron, J. A. (2012). Negative pressure irrigation in endodontics: a review of efficacy. Australian Endodontic Journal, 38(2), 64–70.
20. Tay, F. R., Gu, L. S., Kim, J., & Pashley, D. H. (2010). Effect of EDTA and tetraclean on the smear layer and biofilm removal. Journal of Endodontics, 36(3), 536–540.
21. Zehnder, M., Kosicki, D., Luder, H. U., Sener, B., & Waltimo, T. (2002). Tissue-dissolution capacity and dentin-disinfection potential of hypochlorite-based irrigants. Journal of Endodontics, 28(9), 661–663.
22. Nielsen, B. A., & Baumgartner, J. C. (2007). Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals. Journal of Endodontics, 33(5), 611–615.
23. Mancini, M., Armellin, E., Casaglia, A., Cerroni, L., Cianconi, L., & Conte, G. (2013). A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion using different irrigating solutions. Journal of Endodontics, 39(8), 993–996.
24. Gu, L. S., Kim, J. R., Ling, J., Choi, K. K., Pashley, D. H., & Tay, F. R. (2009). Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. Journal of Endodontics, 35(6), 791–804.
25. Alves, F. R. F., Almeida, B. M., Neves, M. A., Moreno, J. O., & Rôças, I. N. (2011). Disinfecting efficacy of high-powered lasers and ultrasonics. Journal of Endodontics, 37(9), 1272–1275.
26. Ordinola-Zapata, R., Bramante, C. M., Garcia, R. B., & de Andrade, F. B. (2013). The antimicrobial effect of new irrigating solutions against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Journal of Endodontics, 39(7), 873–877.
27. Siqueira, J. F., Rôças, I. N., Favieri, A., Lima, K. C., & Lopes, H. P. (2003). Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation. Journal of Endodontics, 29(3), 133–137.
28. Ahmad, M., Pitt Ford, T. R., & Crum, L. A. (1987). Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role. Journal of Endodontics, 13(10), 490–499.
29. Meire, M. A., De Prijck, K., Coenye, T., Nelis, H. J., & De Moor, R. J. (2012). Effectiveness of different laser systems to kill Enterococcus faecalis in aqueous suspension and in an infected tooth model. International Endodontic Journal, 45(5), 435–443.
30. Kandaswamy, D., Venkateshbabu, N., Porkodi, I., & Pradeep, G. (2010). Dentinal tubule disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gel, propolis, morinda citrifolia juice, and formocresol using Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. Journal of Endodontics, 36(5), 831–833.

Izlang

Izlash

Issue

Research Focus International Scientific Journal 4 (5)

Bo'lim

14.00.00 – Medical sciences

So'ngi nashrlar